首页> 外文OA文献 >A practical discussion to avoid common pitfalls when constructing multiple choice questions items
【2h】

A practical discussion to avoid common pitfalls when constructing multiple choice questions items

机译:在构建多项选择题时避免实际陷阱的实用讨论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper is an attempt to produce a guide for improving the quality of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) used in undergraduate and postgraduate assessment. Multiple Choice Questions type is the most frequently used type of assessment worldwide. Well constructed, context rich MCQs have a high reliability per hour of testing. Avoidance of technical items flaws is essential to improve the validity evidence of MCQs. Technical item flaws are essentially of two types (i) related to testwiseness, (ii) related to irrelevant difficulty. A list of such flaws is presented together with discussion of each flaw and examples to facilitate learning of this paper and to make it learner friendly. This paper was designed to be interactive with self-assessment exercises followed by the key answer with explanations.
机译:本文旨在为提高本科和研究生评估中使用的多项选择题(MCQ)的质量提供指南。多项选择题类型是全球最常用的评估类型。结构良好,上下文相关的MCQ具有每小时测试的高可靠性。避免技术项目缺陷对于提高MCQ的有效性证据至关重要。技术项目缺陷本质上分为两种类型:(i)与测试性有关,(ii)与无关的难度有关。列出了这些缺陷,并讨论了每个缺陷和示例,以促进本文的学习并使其对学习者友好。本文旨在与自我评估练习互动,然后给出关键答案和解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号